Current federal and state conversations about CPS are moving in two, conflicting, directions: a push by advocates to sharply limit “family policing,” reduce mandatory reporting, and narrow or remove “neglect” in law, and an opposing concern from child protection and public health experts that weakening these protections without robust alternative supports will increase lifechanging child abuse and trauma for millions of America’s most vulnerable children. This Safe Passages Investigation makes clear the dangers of child neglect in Child Protective Services.
This debate is not abstract; the original Adverse Childhood Experiences (3M video) (ACE) Study and decades of follow‑up research show that high‑ACE children are far more likely to live dangerous, unhealthy, and shortened lives, and that increasing their numbers has massive long‑term social and economic consequences.
Federal rhetoric and CPS policy shifts
Recent scholarship, advocacy campaigns, and legislative agendas frame CPS as a “family policing” system, emphasizing surveillance, racism, and the criminalization of poverty, particularly for Black, Indigenous, disabled, and low‑income families, as summarized in analyses such as the upEND Movement’s “End Surveillance of Families”
(https://upendmovement.org/end-surveillance-families/) and related law review work on family policing. Proposals under discussion include decriminalizing or eliminating certain neglect categories—especially where the underlying issue is poverty, mental illness, or parental substance use.
These are described in resources like the Yale Law Journal essay “Deinstitutionalizing Family Separation in Cases of Parental Drug Use” (https://yalelawjournal.org/essay/deinstitutionalizing-family-separation-in-cases-of-parental-drug-use).
They also include scaling back mandatory reporting and shifting from hotlines to “warmlines,” as outlined in convenings and task force reports such as Casey Family Programs’ guidance on transforming mandated reporting (https://www.casey.org/mandated-reporting-convening/)
and California’s “Shifting from Reporting Families to Supporting Families” task force report (https://www.caltrin.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/MRCS-Task-Force-Report-for-09-04-24.pdf).
These reforms respond to real harms, but they also risk reducing early identification and response to serious abuse and neglect if not paired with strong, well‑funded prevention infrastructure.
Ending or narrowing “neglect” in law
In practice, “neglect” is the most common category of substantiated maltreatment, encompassing inadequate supervision, failure to provide basic needs, and chronic environmental risks, as outlined in evidence reviews such as “The impacts of abuse and neglect on children”
and NSPCC’s “Protecting children from neglect” (https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/child-abuse-and-neglect/neglect).
Advocates for narrowing or ending neglect statutes argue that they overidentify families whose primary issue is poverty or disability and generate high volumes of low‑substantiation reports that traumatize families and overwhelm CPS.
Child welfare and legal analyses, however, stress that neglect also captures serious, chronic adversity that, left unaddressed, fuels high ACE scores and life‑long harm, as summarized in legal and safeguarding guidance such as “Legal Implications and Protections against Child Neglect” (https://cpdonline.co.uk/knowledge-base/safeguarding/legal-implications-protections-child-neglect/).
If neglect is sharply narrowed or removed without guaranteed access to housing, income supports, childcare, mental health and substance‑use treatment, and home‑visiting services, tens of thousands of children experiencing harmful environments will remain invisible. If child abuse is invisible child neglect is even more invisible.
What the ACE studies add
The original ACE Study (see the foundational paper archived by ESCAP at https://www.escap.eu/uploads/Resources-disorders/felitti-1998-relationship-of-childhood-abuse-and-household.pdf) and subsequent reviews like “The Health and Social Impact of Growing Up With Adverse Childhood Experiences”.
From the Anna Institute: (https://theannainstitute.org/ACE%20folder%20for%20website/50%20Review_of_ACE_Study_with_references_summary_table_2_.pdf) show a clear dose–response relationship between the number of ACEs and adult outcomes, with steep increases in heart disease, cancer, chronic lung disease, liver disease, depression, substance use, and suicide as ACE scores rise. Longitudinal analyses of ACEs and mortality, including “Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Risk of Premature Mortality”
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19840693/), find that people with six or more ACEs die, on average, almost 20 years earlier than those with zero ACEs (around age 60.6 versus 79.1), a finding highlighted in public summaries such as ABC News’ “Childhood Trauma May Shorten Life By 20 Years”
Individuals with four or more ACEs have much higher rates of smoking, alcoholism, drug dependence, risky sexual behavior, and greatly increased risk of chronic illness, with some analyses showing up to two‑fold or greater increases in major diseases like ischemic heart disease and cancer, as summarized in resources such as “Adverse Childhood Experiences and Chronic Disease”
(https://faulktonmedical.org/2021/07/adverse-childhood-experiences-and-chronic-disease/).
In other words, a policy environment that allows more children to accumulate multiple ACEs—through unmitigated abuse, neglect, household violence, and instability—produces a predictable increase in adults who are sicker, die younger, and struggle to live safe, stable lives.
Dangerous trajectories, courts, and justice systems
Recent research on ACEs and justice outcomes, such as “Adverse childhood experiences, and violence and criminal justice outcomes in adulthood”
(https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12619370/), shows that higher ACE counts are linked to greater risk of being victims, witnesses, and perpetrators of violence and to increased odds of both youth and adult criminal justice contact.
High‑ACE adults are over‑represented in juvenile justice, adult corrections, homelessness, and public mental health systems, reflecting decades of dysregulated behavior, addiction, unemployment, and unstable relationships rather than sustained, productive employment—a pattern summarized in broader ACE evidence resources like Emerging Minds’ “Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs): evidence” (https://emergingminds.com.au/resources/adverse-childhood-experiences-aces-summary-of-evidence-and-impacts/).
ACE‑driven trajectories shift people away from productive work and community participation and toward long‑term reliance on courts, jails, prisons, emergency rooms, and public assistance.
Social and economic costs of increasing high‑ACE populations
Economic analyses of child maltreatment and ACE‑related outcomes estimate staggering costs. For child maltreatment broadly, CDC‑linked work such as “The Economic Burden of Child Maltreatment in the United States” (https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/53971) and its later open‑access update (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6289633/)
These estimate lifetime costs per nonfatal victim in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and total annual U.S. burdens in the hundreds of billions, even under conservative assumptions.
Broader ACE‑focused analyses, summarized in reports like “The Economic Costs of ACEs and Toxic Stress” from the California Surgeon General’s initiative (https://osg.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/266/2020/12/Part-I-6.-The-Economic-Costs-of-ACEs-and-Toxic-Stress.pdf), estimate the annual economic burden of ACE‑related adult health conditions at roughly $748 billion in North America, accounting for healthcare, lost productivity, and associated costs.
Syntheses that include health, productivity, and systems costs for untreated childhood trauma—such as KARA’s own analysis “Numbers Too Big To Believe (the cost of untreated childhood trauma)” (https://invisiblechildren.org/2025/03/05/numbers-too-big-to-believe-the-cost-of-untreated-childhood-trauma/)—suggest a multi‑trillion‑dollar annual burden when all ACE‑related impacts are considered.
Because neglect and family adversity drive ACE scores, any policy choice that increases the number of children exposed to unmitigated maltreatment and instability will reliably raise the share of adults with 4–6+ ACEs, the prevalence of chronic disease, disability, and early mortality, and government spending on healthcare, education, welfare, and criminal justice. Even modest increases in the annual number of children who transition from low to high ACE exposure could add tens of billions of dollars in lifetime costs for each cohort, while expanding the population of adults who are unable to sustain employment and disproportionately involved with courts and corrections.
Why this debate matters for CPS design
Efforts to reduce surveillance and punishment in CPS are essential, but ACE research underscores that simply deregulating CPS or erasing “neglect” from the law is not a neutral act—it shifts risk back onto children unless replaced with robust, accountable prevention systems, as emphasized in both mandated‑reporting reform documents and ACE economic analyses.
The evidence from ACEs and maltreatment economics together suggests that weakening protections without building alternative supports will increase the number of high‑ACE children, leading to more dangerous, unstable childhoods, more adults with chronic illness, addiction, and early death, and larger, long‑term social and economic burdens borne by families, communities, and public systems.
Framed this way, the current rhetoric and policy proposals around CPS and neglect are not only about civil liberties and system reform; they are also about whether society chooses to grow or shrink the population of high‑ACE children—and with them (as we have been), the predictable human and fiscal costs that will unfold over the next 30–50 years.
SHARE THIS POST WIDELY – HELP KARA CHANGE THE NARRATIVE &
KEEP CHILDREN SAFE
Inform your legislators and changemakers
Let’s grow awareness and
happier, healthier children
where you live
WHEN YOU Share KARA’s reporting with FRIENDS, INSTAGRAM & FACEBOOK and most of all, educators, school board members, and most importantly, your State Representative (US Legislators here), International legislators Here, change will come a little bit faster when enough of us become informed and speak up for abused and neglected children, ONLY THEN will we improve their lives and our communities!
-
#ChildProtection
-
#ChildWelfare
-
#CPS
-
#FamilyPolicing
-
#ChildNeglect
-
#AdverseChildhoodExperiences
-
#ToxicStress
-
#ChildhoodTrauma
-
#TraumaInformed
-
#ChildAbusePrevention
-
#ChildRights
-
#SocialJustice
-
#Nonprofit
-
#Advocacy
- #publicpolicy
