WHEN YOU Share KARA’s reporting with FRIENDS, INSTAGRAM & FACEBOOK and most of all, your State Representative (find them here) change will come a little bit faster.
When enough of us become informed and speak up for abused and neglected children, we will improve their lives and our communities!
This article is derived from Hana Ikramuddin’s excellent Imprint News Article about Fosters not being notified of their rights – Read the Imprint article here.
Hana tells us the story of AIayna Ghost’s years in Foster Care from ages 7 to 18 and how she ran away almost every year looking for her family. From the article: In foster care, she did not learn she had an older sister until a social worker told her at age 13. Visits between her and some of her siblings happened just once a year, she said, and they were never all placed together. “Whenever I did mention just wanting to be with my siblings again, they just told me it wasn’t reasonable. It wasn’t going to work out. ‘We can’t do that. It can’t happen,’” she said.
Imagine what it’s like being seven years old and removed from the only home you have ever known, waking up in a strange house, going to a new school, with no familiar faces or friendships to ease the trauma of being removed from your birth home.
In Minnesota, foster children have clear legal rights to maintain relationships with their siblings and family when it supports their safety and wellbeing.
The Minnesota Sibling Bill of Rights, found in Minnesota Statutes § 260C.008, states that children in foster care have the right to be placed with, or near, their siblings whenever possible, and to have regular, meaningful contact through visits, phone calls, or video chats unless doing so is unsafe.
From the article, “A 2020 analysis by Casey Family Programs found that between 53% and 80% of foster children across the country live separately from their siblings, depriving them of many benefits. Children placed with siblings are more likely to achieve permanent homes through reunification, adoption and guardianship, according to research cited by the federal Administration on Children, Youth and Families’ Children’s Bureau.
Here’s a clear breakdown separating the best and worst states for foster child rights and care as of 2025, including direct links to their official information sources where available. Read More:
Best States for Foster Child Rights and Care
Minnesota – The Foster Youth Bill of Rights (§ 260C.008) guarantees placement with siblings whenever safe, participation in court hearings, and access to needed services. Minnesota is also developing a stronger comprehensive rights law.
California – The Foster Youth Bill of Rights protects dignity, education, safety, and sibling contact, with clear grievance and reporting systems run by the state Office of the Foster Care Ombudsperson.
New York – Implements a robust youth advocacy network and court participation structure under Title 18 NYCRR § 441. Rights include fair treatment, contact with family, and participation in permanency planning.
Washington State – Codified in RCW 13.60.010, guaranteeing foster youth rights to safe housing, sibling communication, education continuity, and independent‑living support.
Massachusetts – Ranks among the top states for overall child well‑being, per the 2025 KIDS COUNT Data Book, and provides a “Foster Child Bill of Rights” ensuring education and healthcare continuity.
Colorado – Adopted a youth Bill of Rights in 2024; youth now have legal access to ombudsman complaint procedures and transition‑planning oversight.
Worst or Weakest States for Foster Child Oversight and Rights
Texas – The state lists basic DFPS rights for foster youth but suffers from limited enforcement, unsafe placements, and federal court findings of “systemic failures” in child safety monitoring.
Alabama – No statutory Foster Youth Bill of Rights. The state’s general foster information is limited to rules for caregivers at Alabama DHR – Foster Care Programs.
South Dakota – Youth guidance appears only in the Young Voices Handbook and in Religious Rights of Youth in Out‑of‑Home Care documents; there is no official Bill of Rights.
Wyoming – The 2024 Legislative Interim Report on Foster Care reveals capacity and training shortages. Wyoming’s DFS FAQ page only outlines caregiver FAQs, not youth protections.
Mississippi – While its Department of Child Protection Services page for foster youth exists, Mississippi lacks an enforceable rights statute, and its religious‑rights guidance page covers limited protections only.
West Virginia – Limited to a Foster and Kinship Parent Bill of Rights; children’s rights remain largely undefined in law. New proposals, like Senate Bill 886 (2025), would expand obligations but remain pending passage.
Nevada – An improved but still new system with the 2023 Bill of Rights for Children in Care; implementation and compliance oversight are still developing.
Kansas – Recently enacted the DCF Foster Care Bill of Rights (2025) under HB 2024 – Gail Finney Memorial Bill of Rights, but advocates say children lack clear recourse if rights are violated.
Michigan – The MDHHS Foster Care overview lists only administrative supports. Oversight cuts led to reported emergencies, as detailed in Michigan Public Radio’s Kent County foster care report (Oct 2025).
Alaska – Cited in KTOO and national lawsuits as having one of the most under‑resourced systems in the U.S. (see report summary via KTOO.org). The system faces extreme staff shortages, infrequent home visits, and repeated failure to meet federal child‑safety benchmarks.
Summary Snapshot
Best performers (strong law + enforcement): Minnesota, California, Washington, Massachusetts, Colorado
Middle (emerging rights, mixed oversight): Nevada, Kansas, New Jersey, Illinois, Oregon
Weakest performers (little or no enforceable rights): Texas, Alabama, South Dakota, Wyoming, Mississippi, West Virginia, Michigan, Alaska
Together, the data—supported by NCSL’s state tracking page and FosterClub’s national database—show that roughly half of U.S. states still lack an enforceable framework comparable to Minnesota’s, leaving children’s safety and participation rights largely dependent on agency policy rather than statute.
KARA has been funding the Financial Literacy Project,
INVISIBLE CHILDREN Campus Programs,
public presentations, books, and social media for many years.
We have had a really impactful 25 years thanks to our followers.
But here’s the reality-as we are an advocacy group not providing service we live on donations alone. We want to keep the momentum going but we need the funds to do so…
So, we are asking for your help as a way to support all our efforts going forward. Please consider a monthly donation of 5 or 25$ to sustain KARA’s ongoing efforts.
An additional choice, would be to sponsor a our new Spotify Social media platform for $500 and receive recognition for you or your organization Thank you to those who have sponsored a KARA projects in the past!
For stock and legacy donations contact mike@invisiblechildren.org with donations in the Subject line.
#childprotection,#childhoodtrauma,#publicpolicy,#kidsatrisk,#kara,#casaguardianadlitem,#childadvocacycenter,#volunteer,#foster,#cps,#childprotection,#publichealth,#aces,#adversechildexperience
KIDS AT RISK ACTION / KARA / INVISIBLE CHILDREN
